From: | "Anjan Dave" <adave(at)vantage(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Server Configs |
Date: | 2003-11-11 22:57:15 |
Message-ID: | 2F2E24372F10744588A27DEECC85FE04023C416E@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Dear Gurus,
We are planning to add more db server hardware for the apps. The
question is, what makes more sense regarding
performance/scalability/price of the hardware...
There are a couple of apps, currently on a dual-cpu Dell server. The
usage of the apps is going to increase quite a lot, and considering the
prices, we are looking at the following options:
Option 1:
==========
Have each app on a separate db server (looking at 4 of these). The
server being a PowerEdge 2650, Dual 2.8GHz/512KB XEONS, 2GB RAM, PERC-3
RAID-5, split back plane (2+3), and 5 x 36GB HDDs (10K RPM).
Note: These servers are 1/3 the price of the Quad-cpu 6650 server.
Option 2:
==========
Have two to three apps dbs hosted on a single server. The server being a
PowerEdge 6650, 4 x 2GHz/1MB XEONS, 8GB RAM, PERC-3 RAID-5, split back
plane (2+3), and 5 x 36GB HDDs (10K RPM).
Note: This server is 3 times more the price of the option 1.
Appreciate your guidance.
Thanks,
Anjan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Field | 2003-11-11 23:32:47 | Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine |
Previous Message | Nick Fankhauser - Doxpop | 2003-11-11 22:26:48 | Seeking help with a query that take too long |