| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Deucher <alexdeucher(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
| Date: | 2007-03-02 21:34:19 |
| Message-ID: | 2EB9B5FC-E7D5-46A7-8068-6C5D059E7781@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 02.03.2007, at 14:20, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Ah OK. I see what you are saying; thank you for clarifying. Yes,
> the SAN is configured for maximum capacity; it has large RAID 5
> groups. As I said earlier, we never intended to run a DB on the SAN,
> it just happened to come up, hence the configuration.
So why not dumping the stuff ones, importing into a PG configured to
use local discs (Or even ONE local disc, you might have the 16GB you
gave as a size for the db on the local machine, right?) and testing
whether the problem is with PG connecting to the SAN. So you have one
factor less to consider after all your changes.
Maybe it's just that something in the chain from PG to the actual HD
spindles kills your random access performance for getting the actual
rows.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2007-03-02 22:59:29 | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Alex Deucher | 2007-03-02 21:20:41 | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |