From: | <James_Hughes(at)McAfee(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Initdb on Windows 2003 |
Date: | 2006-03-03 15:54:02 |
Message-ID: | 2E22904642859A40AF5E1CA1597EBB1F02EF424E@devexmb1.corp.nai.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think we can safely say that it is not :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
Sent: 03 March 2006 15:41
To: Magnus Hagander
Cc: Hughes, James; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Initdb on Windows 2003
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
>
>>Have raised a helpdesk ticket with Microsoft, see if they can shed any
>>light on the problem.
>>
>>
>
>Sounds good - since you can reproduce it with a simple commandline,
>they should at least accept touching the case ;-)
>
>
>
In any case, since dir > nul fails, I think we can probably say it's Not
Our Problem (tm).
We've used nul on Windows ever since initdb was written in C.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-03-03 16:02:22 | Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked? |
Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-03-03 15:50:51 | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit, Call for |