From: | Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Ben-Nes Michael' <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>, postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Recomended FS |
Date: | 2003-10-20 17:32:41 |
Message-ID: | 2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC092443@THOR.goeci.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
You'd be well served if you could benchmark several filesystems and see
which one gives the best "performance" (talk about a loaded term) for your
application. Having said that, however, I'd recommend XFS for its
combination of performance and userspace tools (particularly xfsdump and
xfs_freeze).
Cheers,
Murthy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ben-Nes Michael [mailto:miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il]
>Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 04:48
>To: postgresql
>Subject: [GENERAL] Recomended FS
>
>
>Hi
>
>I'm upgrading the DB sever hardware and also the Linux OS.
>
>My Questions are:
>
>1. What is the preferred FS to go with ? EXT3, Reiseref, JFS,
>XFS ? ( speed,
>efficiency )
>2. What is the most importent part in the Hardware ? fast HD,
>alot of mem,
>or maybe strong cpu ?
>
>Thanks in Advance
>
>--------------------------
>Canaan Surfing Ltd.
>Internet Service Providers
>Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
>Tel: 972-4-6991122
>Fax: 972-4-6990098
>http://www.canaan.net.il
>--------------------------
>
>
>---------------------------(end of
>broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2003-10-20 19:02:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Writers Wanted |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-20 17:29:33 | Re: plpgsql |