| From: | Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Speed & Memory Management [2] |
| Date: | 2003-04-02 22:59:16 |
| Message-ID: | 2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC0921C5@THOR.goeci.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> This, and the message from Tom Lane, seem inconsistent with the
>> documentation re "Character Types"
>> (http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/datatype-character.html)
>> which says:
>>
>> "Tip: There are no performance differences between these three types,
apart
>> from the increased storage size when using the blank-padded type."
>
>What are you saying? This is exactly true. Of course the padding might
>also take time, not only space, but we don't want to get too picky here.
>
Fair enough.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Murthy Kambhampaty | 2003-04-03 00:21:18 | Re: LVM snapshots |
| Previous Message | Andrew Biagioni | 2003-04-02 22:24:22 | Re: Speed & Memory Management |