Re: Slow Query Help

From: Will Platnick <wplatnick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow Query Help
Date: 2013-02-06 13:17:50
Message-ID: 2CB5B53971DB42238A7640E6EFAE8D19@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Good eye, I totally missed that!

Any ideas on how to troubleshoot this delay?

On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Will Platnick <wplatnick(at)gmail(dot)com (mailto:wplatnick(at)gmail(dot)com)> wrote:
> > We upgraded from PG 9.1 to 9.2. Since the upgrade, the # of active queries
> > has raised significantly, especially during our peak time where lots of
> > users are logging in. According to New Relic, this query is now taking up
> > the most amount of time during peak activity and my pg_stat_activity and
> > slow log sampling agrees. We have 3 DB servers referenced here, production
> > running 9.2.2, semi-idle (idle except for replication when I ran the test)
> > running 9.2.2, and 9.1.3 completely idle with an old dump restored.
> >
>
>
> The only thing that stands out is: on your production server I see
> "Total runtime: 7.515 ms", but the top node in EXPLAIN ANAYZE shows
> actual time as 0.179 ms. Not sure where that additional time is being
> spent though. It could be ExecutorStart/End, but have no idea why they
> should take so long.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
> --
> Pavan Deolasee
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Whittaker 2013-02-06 15:42:11 Re: postgresql.conf recommendations
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-06 12:49:47 Re: postgresql.conf recommendations