Re: A renaming analogy

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A renaming analogy
Date: 2007-09-03 19:18:16
Message-ID: 2C9BB0D86C66ADCAA594AF29@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Monday, September 03, 2007 06:21:26 -0400 Robert Bernier
<robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:

> On Sunday 2 September 2007 20:23, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On 9/2/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
>> > In thinking about the renaming issue, I remembered a case that is a
>> > good analogy with ours: FedEx.
>>
>> Good analogy.
>
> other examples of change
>
> BMO: Bank of Montreal
> KFC: Kentucky Fired Chicken
> TD: Toronto Dominion Bank
>
> This shortening of company names has been going ever since the term
> "trans-global corporation" came into common parlance.

Wow, and I notice a trend there also ... all multi-million dollar companies
with a shit load of money to burn on marketing ...

And, in fact, KFC is a bad example ... they were court ordered to change, due
to the questionability of the 'Chicken' part of the name ...

And, most places I look still refer to 'Bank of Montreal', or 'BMO Bank of
Montreal', which I've always found to be a bit weird/redundant ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFG3F344QvfyHIvDvMRAmZZAJwOIKmNixW9rqmOCM7Haa4znOQzzgCg3hP7
VOp96T9m6+O2/ody17oUrZc=
=MYnI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-09-03 19:20:54 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-09-03 18:32:01 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)