From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby |
Date: | 2009-01-04 16:40:21 |
Message-ID: | 2BCDDAF6-A81B-4EC6-8A4E-AB1DE16C4801@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What I ifind interesting about this is that whereas I had been
concerned that adding hot standby late in the development cycle might
be destabilize the tree and add lots of time to the release cycle it
seems having it might actually increase our ability to see problems in
the recovery code which was previously quite hard to test.
--
Greg
On 4 Jan 2009, at 09:59, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I can reproduce that too with CVS HEAD, so it's clearly a bug. I
>> probably introduced it with the recent smgr changes; I'll try to
>> hunt it down.
>
> Now that was an embarrassingly simple bug:
>
> --- a/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
> +++ b/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ RelationCreateStorage(RelFileNode rnode, bool
> istemp)
> srel = smgropen(rnode);
> smgrcreate(srel, MAIN_FORKNUM, false);
>
> - if (istemp)
> + if (!istemp)
> {
> /*
> * Make an XLOG entry showing the file creation. If we
> abort, the file
>
> Fixed, as well as the same bug in RelationTruncate. Thanks for
> report, I'll keep this brown paper bag on for a few days...
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-04 17:14:38 | Re: parallel restore |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-04 16:18:34 | Re: New patch for Column-level privileges |