From: | "Sander Steffann" <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "'Postgresql Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2003-12-16 09:15:00 |
Message-ID: | 2B1A983EDCEC3447B22632B64F7264600B73B9@bill.office.computel.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> Alternative thought: just recommend that if possible, people
> take a filesystem dump of their old PGDATA directory after
> stopping the old postmaster. This would be sufficient for
> retreating to the prior version if needed. It might or might
> not be slower than copying all the files to a new PGDATA ...
Filesystem-level snapshots make this very easy. Combined with:
Dave Smith <dave(dot)smith(at)candata(dot)com> writes:
> Why not go the other way.
> 1) Dump the schemas.
> 2) Initdb with the new schemas in a tmp PGDATA
> 3) backup the schemas in the current PGDATA
> 4) move the new schemas from the new db into the current one.
Then it would be possible to:
1) Stop old postmaster
2) Make a filesystem snapshot
3) Upgrade the schemas in-place (as described above)
4) Start new postmaster
*) On error: revert filesystem to snapshot
Would be very nice for those who can use filesystem snapshots.
Sander.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudia D'amato | 2003-12-16 09:15:18 | Postgres respond after toomany times to a query view |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-16 09:08:51 | Re: 7.4 include file conflict |