Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

Hi,

On January 5, 2022 8:30:17 PM PST, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>At Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:05:08 -0800, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in
>> The tap tests seems to fail on all platforms. See
>> https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4911549314760704
>>
>> E.g. the linux failure is
>>
>> [16:45:15.569]
>> [16:45:15.569] # Failed test 'inserted'
>> [16:45:15.569] # at t/027_persistence_change.pl line 121.
>> [16:45:15.569] # Looks like you failed 1 test of 25.
>> [16:45:15.569] [16:45:15] t/027_persistence_change.pl ..........
>> [16:45:15.569] Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> [16:45:15.569] Failed 1/25 subtests
>> [16:45:15.569] [16:45:15]
>> [16:45:15.569]
>> [16:45:15.569] Test Summary Report
>> [16:45:15.569] -------------------
>> [16:45:15.569] t/027_persistence_change.pl (Wstat: 256 Tests: 25 Failed: 1)
>> [16:45:15.569] Failed test: 18
>> [16:45:15.569] Non-zero exit status: 1
>> [16:45:15.569] Files=27, Tests=315, 220 wallclock secs ( 0.14 usr 0.03 sys + 48.94 cusr 17.13 csys = 66.24 CPU)
>>
>> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4785083130314752/tap/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/log/regress_log_027_persistence_change
>
>Thank you very much. It still doesn't fail on my devlopment
>environment (CentOS8), but I found a silly bug of the test script.
>I'm still not sure the reason the test item failed but I repost the
>updated version then watch what the CI says.

Fwiw, you can now test the same way as cfbot does with a lower turnaround time, as explained in src/tools/ci/README
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.