Re: [Spam] Re: Restart increment to 0 each year = re-in

From: "Priem, Alexander" <ap(at)cict(dot)nl>
To: "'btober(at)computer(dot)org'" <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: Restart increment to 0 each year = re-in
Date: 2004-04-26 12:30:16
Message-ID: 2A07EC2D0BC2774AAD6F74769F60D52A083315@ahmose.cict_ad.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > You can set a sequence 'nextval' with the following statement :
> >
> > SELECT setval('XXX_YYY_seq',0);
>
> The statement above will not work (... at least, it will not work in
> PostgreSQL 7.3.1 -- I don't know if the new version has changed this
> behavior...but I doubt it). You have to use something like

I use a statement like "SELECT setval('XXX_YYY_seq',0)" myself. It
definitely works in 7.4(+).

> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.set_sequence(name, int4)
> RETURNS int4 AS
> '
> DECLARE
> l_sequence_name ALIAS FOR $1;
> l_last_value ALIAS FOR $2;
> BEGIN
> IF l_last_value = 0 THEN
> PERFORM setval(l_sequence_name,1, False);
> ELSE
> PERFORM setval(l_sequence_name,l_last_value);
> END IF;
> RETURN 0;
> END;'
> LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
>
>
> >
> > XXX is the table name.
> > YYY is the name of the field containing the 'serial' value.
> >
> > The next value inserted in the table will then have a (serial) value of
> > '0' or '1', I am not entirely sure which (I think '1').
> > Alexander Priem.
>
> --Berend Tober

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message btober 2004-04-26 12:34:32 Re: Restart increment to 0 each year = re-invent the se
Previous Message Ken Harris 2004-04-26 12:11:37 List Removal