Re: Why facebook used mysql ?

From: Graham Leggett <minfrin(at)sharp(dot)fm>
To: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
Date: 2010-11-09 20:04:58
Message-ID: 29F81CF4-7A79-4AF5-BB6F-2FB6D93DBDE1@sharp.fm
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 09 Nov 2010, at 7:30 PM, David Boreham wrote:

> Sorry but this is 100% not true. It may be true for a 3rd party (you
> release something under the GPL, I enhance it, therefore I am
> required to release my enhancement under the GPL). But Oracle owns
> the copyright to the MySql code and therefore they can decide to do
> whatever they want with it. The only thing they can't do is to 'un-
> release' existing code released under the GPL. Everything else is
> possible.
>
> Ownership of the copyright trumps the GPL.

Ownership of the copyright is owned by whoever made the contribution,
and any competent version control system will give you the list of
contributions (and therefore contributors). If a contribution was made
in terms of the GPL, then permission would need to be sought from
everyone who has made a contribution before it could be released under
a different license.

Regards,
Graham
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-11-09 20:11:47 Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-09 19:21:42 Re: I guess I'm missing something here WRT FOUND