Re: Draft release notes up for review

From: Jonathan Katz <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes up for review
Date: 2017-08-05 21:09:32
Message-ID: 29F43459-7978-4D59-A73B-BBE5BDD17E16@excoventures.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

> On Aug 4, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8
>
> (If you prefer to read nicely-marked-up copy, they should be up at
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6-4.html
> in a couple hours from now.)

Thank you for putting these together. For the press release, are there any features you (or anyone on -hackers) do you see any fixes you would like to highlight?

I see this one

> Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a multixact with exactly one still-interesting member

But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-05 21:37:33 Re: Draft release notes up for review
Previous Message Mark Rofail 2017-08-05 20:36:38 Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays