From: | Lonni Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuumdb is failing with NUMBER OF INDEX TUPLES NOT THE SAME AS HEAP |
Date: | 2004-05-05 15:43:33 |
Message-ID: | 29C00AA5.19F9A12C@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Its _always_ that same index. No others have had this problem.
Unfortunately, i have no clue how to replicate this. It was happening
fairly consistantly before i upgraded from 7.3.3 to 7.3.4 (like nearly
every vacuumdb run).
Then nothing for a month after going to 7.3.4, and now its happening
every vacuumdb run again.
On Wed, 05 May 2004 11:30:33 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Lonni Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > All of a sudden last month (after about 3 years) I started getting
> > this warning when vacuumdb was run:
>
> > INFO: Index pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index: Pages 903; Tuples 323847:
> > Deleted 0. CPU 0.04s/0.07u sec elapsed 0.10 sec.
> > WARNING: Index pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES
> > (323847) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (323802).
> > Recreate the index.
>
> Hmm. Is it always that same index, or have you seen this on other indexes?
>
> I'm not aware of any known bug in 7.3.* that could lead to this sort of
> error. Don't suppose you have any suggestions about how to reproduce
> the problem?
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Ruth | 2004-05-05 16:12:00 | Re: PERFORM function in Plpgsql |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2004-05-05 15:37:25 | Re: Is there a newer version of DBD::Pg? |