From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3) |
Date: | 2004-04-01 16:29:38 |
Message-ID: | 29981.1080836978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> I can resubmit a new patch that would provide the needed infrastructure
> AND some hints on some commands as a proof of concept of what can be
> achieved.
I quite agree that you shouldn't do a complete implementation when it's
not clear if we'll accept it or not. What I'd like to see is a demo,
basically. How about one example of each of several different kinds
of hints? We need to get a feeling for what can be accomplished and how
messy the grammar would get.
BTW, it seems like you are putting in a lot of infrastructure to
recreate externally the parse-stack state that bison has internally.
Maybe an interesting alternative would be to look at touching that
state directly. I realize that bison doesn't consider that part of
their official API, but bison is a stable tool and seems unlikely to
change much in the future. We could probably get away with it...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-04-02 10:04:26 | Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3) |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-04-01 16:10:20 | Re: hint infrastructure setup (v3) |