| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: renumber_oids.pl needs some updates |
| Date: | 2022-04-20 21:10:18 |
| Message-ID: | 2997791.1650489018@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 20.04.22 22:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The attached proposed patch invents a variant macro
>> DECLARE_TOAST_WITH_MACRO for the relatively small number of cases
>> where we need such OID macros.
> This makes sense.
> A more elaborate (future) project would be to have genbki.pl generate
> all of IsSharedRelation(), which is the only place these toast-table-OID
> macros are used, AFAICT.
Perhaps. We invent shared catalogs at a slow enough rate that I'm
not sure the effort would ever pay for itself in person-hours,
but maybe making such invention a trifle less error-prone is
worth something.
I'd still want to keep this form of DECLARE_TOAST, in case someone
comes up with a different reason to want macro names for toast OIDs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-04-20 21:21:29 | Re: Add version and data directory to initdb output |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-04-20 21:04:05 | Re: Add version and data directory to initdb output |