Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date: 2013-05-02 18:45:51
Message-ID: 29974.1367520351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Maybe we can make BEFORE and AFTER implied aliases rather than
> keywords. What say?

Well, they still have to be unreserved keywords for their use in
trigger-related commands, but as far as this feature is concerned
I think they're best off being handled as automatically-supplied
aliases. IOW the patch needn't touch gram.y at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-05-02 18:47:28 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-02 18:44:57 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax