Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2020-04-10 15:44:35
Message-ID: 2996.1586533475@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 20:44, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> In that case, we really should add the PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY to make
>> the compiler happy.

> Attaching my patch again. It doesn't need PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY as well.
> Kuntal has confirmed that this fixes the warning for him.

I see no patch here ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-04-10 15:48:39 Re: where should I stick that backup?
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-04-10 15:37:25 Re: Report error position in partition bound check