From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
Date: | 2005-05-12 13:50:28 |
Message-ID: | 29950.1115905828@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not entirely. We should move around the test sql script and the expected
>> result file so that the file structure looks exactly like one of the
>> test-enabled contrib modules.
> That's pretty much what I thought I did except that I put it all in the
> test subdir. Frankly, I think that's a better arrangement - having
> cube/cube.sql and cube/sql/cube.sql is confusing - putting test stuff in
> a test subdirectory makes its purpose clear.
[ shrug... ] I don't see a good argument for making the PLs have a
directory layout that is different from the one in use in contrib.
If you want to argue that all of the contrib subdirectories should
be changed, bring it up in -hackers; but it is hard to get excited
about.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-12 14:09:23 | Re: implementing NOTIFY with message parameter |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-12 13:40:40 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-12 14:28:43 | Re: lastval() |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-12 13:40:40 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |