Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> It's only half related, but since we're talking about renovating guc.c: I
> think it'd be good if we split the list of GUCs from the rest of the guc
> machinery. Both for humans and compilers it's getting pretty large. And
> commonly one either wants to edit the definition of GUCs or wants to edit the
> GUC machinery.
I don't mind doing that, but it seems like an independent patch.
regards, tom lane