Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-01-19 02:03:08
Message-ID: 2993.916711388@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> writes:
> For the table with single int4 column & 2000 INSERTs I have:

> BEGIN/END: 3.5sec ~600insert/sec
> Without: 151sec ~13insert/sec

> (IDE disk!)

> I guess that you don't use -F flag..?

*Do* use -F, you meant of course. You're right, I do. With an
fsync after every transaction, I'm sure my test would've been much
slower.

However, with a UPS and an OS that only crashes about once every
other year, I feel pretty secure using -F ...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-01-19 02:15:01 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 1999-01-18 23:15:06 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof