| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi <sasrizavi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion |
| Date: | 2022-12-04 20:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | 2992334.1670184844@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 4 Dec 2022, at 16:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Our policy is that the in-tree .gitignore files should only hide
>> files that are build artifacts of standard build processes.
>> Something like this belongs in your personal ~/.gitexclude,
>> instead.
> Since this comes up every now and again, I wonder if it's worth documenting
> this in our .gitignore along the lines of:
Good idea.
>> (BTW, perhaps we should remove the entries targeting ".sl"
>> extensions? AFAIK that was only for HP-UX, which is now
>> desupported.)
> +1. Grepping through the .gitignores in the tree didn't reveal anything else
> that seemed to have outlived its usefulness.
I'll make it so. Thanks for checking.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2022-12-04 22:48:43 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-12-04 20:02:04 | Re: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion |