Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
Date: 2003-11-11 14:27:54
Message-ID: 29923.1068560874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think this is the patch I like.

The #if coding is messy and unnecessary. You could do the test as per
the non-POSIX variant using two calls of pqsignal(), and not have any
system dependence here, nor a need for <signal.h>.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-11 14:30:09 Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
Previous Message mendola 2003-11-11 11:10:43 cancel <3FB0C0CE.6050007@bigfoot.com>