From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "patrick k (dot)" <patrick+pgsql(at)pioneerdigital(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to include PostgreSQL Copyright notice |
Date: | 2002-05-16 03:18:13 |
Message-ID: | 29909.1021519093@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"patrick k ." <patrick+pgsql(at)pioneerdigital(dot)com> writes:
> There seems to be a slight uncertainty on what and how should our
> software provide all that is required to conform to the
> PostgreSQL (BSD) licensing terms and conditions.
By and large, the BSD license doesn't put *any* requirements on you.
We'd get unhappy if you tried to claim you owned Postgres, but short
of that you can include it in your product without any problem.
> - Is including the COPYRIGHT file from the PostgreSQL sources as
> part of our distribution be:
> + Sufficient?
> + A starting point?
Sufficient, certainly; some would say you needn't do even that.
If you wanted to mention "This product uses PostgreSQL, which you can
learn more about at http://www.postgresql.org/" then everyone would be
happy. You need not do that, but it'd be a polite thing to do.
> - Do we need to have a hardcopy of the contents in COPYRIGHT
> file included with our hardcopy documentation?
Not if you don't want to.
> - Should any of our software display PostgreSQL Copyright
> information:
Not required. The strictest reading of the BSD license is that
the notice has to be present somewhere in your distribution.
Putting it on a splash screen is surely more than is needed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Burton | 2002-05-16 03:55:19 | Re: books on pl/pgsql |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-05-16 03:04:29 | Re: How to include PostgreSQL Copyright notice |