Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date: 2025-02-21 06:04:39
Message-ID: 2990641.1740117879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I pushed the final piece yesterday.

trilobite reports that this fails under -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=trilobite&dt=2025-02-20%2019%3A37%3A12

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-02-21 06:11:26 Re: pg_recvlogical requires -d but not described on the documentation
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-02-21 05:47:45 Re: BgBufferSync(): clarification about reusable_buffers variable