| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WITH HOLD and pooled connections |
| Date: | 2003-08-08 20:36:03 |
| Message-ID: | 29904.1060374963@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I'm leaning towards the idea that a protocol addition is what to
>> do.
> I am confused why a protocol change would be desired.
I was thinking that you might want it at a lower level than having to
issue a SQL command to get at the data. A lot of what we changed in
the 7.4 protocol revision involved eliminating the need to use SQL
commands to get at information that a client library needs.
But see my later note questioning just how useful these features would
really be.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-08-08 20:41:19 | Re: WITH HOLD and pooled connections |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-08-08 20:34:23 | Re: UnixWare/Compiler Stuff |