| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Johansson <jan(dot)johansson(dot)mr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance |
| Date: | 2016-05-23 22:26:24 |
| Message-ID: | 29886.1464042384@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> But then again, maybe we need to start with a clear notion of what
> problems people are trying to solve when they use partitions. At least
> some of the historic reasons are no longer valid.
That's true. Just because people want to have a gazillion partitions
doesn't necessarily mean it's a good design that we need to support well.
Some investigation would be a smart use of time.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-05-23 22:31:25 | Re: Inheritance |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2016-05-23 22:18:34 | Re: Inheritance |