Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2010/12/17 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> I'm not really impressed with this idea: there's no a priori reason
>> that all those loop types would necessarily have exactly the same
>> control logic.
> There is no reason why the processing should be same, but actually is same.
Yes, and it might need to be different in future, whereupon this patch
would make life extremely difficult.
regards, tom lane