From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. |
Date: | 2022-04-27 02:14:25 |
Message-ID: | 298622.1651025665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Ok, that's the same for me. Next question: why does the patch I
> posted not help?
I improved the instrumentation a bit, and it looks like what is
happening is that loc > read_upto, causing that code to "break"
independently of wait_for_wal. success.log is from "make installcheck"
immediately after initdb; fail.log is from "make check".
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
debug.patch | text/x-diff | 1.4 KB |
success.log | text/plain | 5.4 KB |
fail.log | text/plain | 7.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-27 02:15:16 | Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-04-27 02:10:49 | Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-04-27 02:15:16 | Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-04-27 02:10:49 | Re: pgsql: Add contrib/pg_walinspect. |