Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <notifications(at)github(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-07 17:06:19
Message-ID: 2985694.6sf3WoXAWz@nb.usersys.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Thursday 07 of January 2016 11:58:29 Pavel Kajaba wrote:
> maybe, but right after pom files are downloaded jars. Aren't they?

Ah, I've killed the build process on my box as soon as I noticed it
downloads something from Internet. That is not acceptable in FOSS
packaging for distributions -- there can be dependencies, but those must
be built from source, too. The tarball should be self-standing with
requirements installed on the system, without even trying to connect to
Internet.

Pavel

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vladimir Sitnikov" <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
> To: "Pavel Raiskup" <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
> Cc: "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "List" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavel Kajaba" <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Dave Cramer" <notifications(at)github(dot)com>, "Devrim GÜNDÜZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 5:54:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
>
> > basically equivalent to downloading pre-compiled '*.jar',
>
> It is equivalent to downloading a *compiler*. You need to have a
> compiler in order to build a tool, don't you?
>
> Vladimir
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-07 17:10:04 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-07 17:00:26 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)