| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: troubleshooting pointers |
| Date: | 2002-05-12 15:34:24 |
| Message-ID: | 29832.1021217664@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Actually I found late last night that when the view is used, the RTE is
> a RangeVar, so the RangeFunction code never gets executed. So I think
> your comment above is right on. That may well explain both problems.
Hmm. I thought your view problems were explained by the cut-and-pasteos
I noticed in _readRangeTblEntry. Maybe there's more though. I haven't
got to the point of trying to actually execute the patch ... will work
on it more today.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-12 15:37:51 | Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-12 15:31:26 | Re: Nested transactions RFC |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-05-12 15:54:59 | Re: Set Returning Functions (SRF) - request for patch review |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-12 03:36:01 | Re: troubleshooting pointers |