From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thiemo Kellner <thiemo(at)gelassene-pferde(dot)biz> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgcrypto.gen_random_uuid() or uuid-ossp.uuid_generate_v4()? |
Date: | 2018-02-06 14:56:44 |
Message-ID: | 29828.1517929004@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thiemo Kellner <thiemo(at)gelassene-pferde(dot)biz> writes:
> I consider using uuid as primary key type. The documentation of
> uuid-ossp states
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/uuid-ossp.html#idm46428633607040)
> makes a note to consider the pgcrypto function instead but not why.
> Can somebody shed some light on that matter?
I believe the point of the recommendation is that if you only need type-4
UUIDs, you can get that from pgcrypto without needing the external
dependency of the OSSP UUID library. This is a bit less urgent than when
that text was written, because now we also support building that contrib
module against some other implementations; but there are still going to
be systems on which installing uuid-ossp is inconvenient.
There may also be a belief that pgcrypto's result is more
cryptographically secure, though I wouldn't swear to that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thiemo Kellner, NHC Barhufpflege | 2018-02-06 15:22:20 | Re: pgcrypto.gen_random_uuid() or uuid-ossp.uuid_generate_v4()? |
Previous Message | Thiemo Kellner, NHC Barhufpflege | 2018-02-06 14:21:54 | Re: pgcrypto.gen_random_uuid() or uuid-ossp.uuid_generate_v4()? |