Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: siracusa(at)mindspring(dot)com
Cc: Postgres Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of
Date: 2004-03-07 05:12:49
Message-ID: 29810.1078636369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

John Siracusa <siracusa(at)mindspring(dot)com> writes:
> When I got the 5 failures with an unmodified CVS checkout earlier, I didn't
> even bother to look at the diffs because I just accepted that as my baseline
> (it is CVS, after all, and things are in flux).

Just for the record, we don't consider regression failures as status quo
even in CVS tip. People aren't supposed to commit changes that break
regression. If you see a failure appear that wasn't there before, by
all means report it immediately --- it's easiest to fix portability bugs
while the relevant changes are still fresh in mind.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-07 05:48:46 Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes
Previous Message John Siracusa 2004-03-07 04:40:50 Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of