Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9
Date: 2007-04-20 15:21:56
Message-ID: 29809.1177082516@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... not sure if this is related, but there's something mighty fishy
>> about that "key" parameter. I'd expect to see key=5432001, or something
>> close to that depending on what port number you're using.
>>
> But is this the case when doing 'make check'?

Oh, right, at that point it's a standalone backend not a postmaster,
so no port. Never Mind ...

> Since the ENOMEM problem occurs in a simple shared memory test program,
> I'm inquiring on an Apple dev list.

Sounds like a plan.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Schulthess 2007-04-20 16:00:19 returning setof varchar
Previous Message Kevin Murphy 2007-04-20 15:14:18 Re: Building PG 8.2.3 for x86_64 on Mac OS X 10.4.9