es_BaseId/cs_base_id seem to be dead code?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: es_BaseId/cs_base_id seem to be dead code?
Date: 2000-07-09 19:40:26
Message-ID: 29793.963171626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

AFAICT, the EState field es_BaseId and the CommonState field cs_base_id
are not used for anything, and so the plan-initialization code that
sets them is a complete waste of time.

Presumably these were once used for something, but I can't think of
any good reason not to remove them. Does anyone see a reason to
keep them?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Louis Bertrand 2000-07-09 20:29:52 PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-09 18:35:40 Re: [SQL] MAX() of 0 records.