| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jonathan <jonathan(at)leto(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 18:37:39 |
| Message-ID: | 29789.1266950259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 00:50, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 14:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I'm inclined to stay with the same basic
>>> implementation and just hack up the regexp some more to cope with 5.11's
>>> more verbose -v output.
>>
>> And here is a stab at that:
> Grr... stupid word wrapping. Attached.
Looks good, applied. I did throw in one more [0-9] just to be on the
safe side.
BTW, it's really *not* necessary to include configure in submitted
diffs. That's a derived file.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-02-23 20:39:46 | Re: BUG #5339: Version of Perl detected incorrectly |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-23 17:31:37 | Re: BUG #5343: Documentation error for pg_dump |