| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com" <shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum, xid wraparound, pg_database column values |
| Date: | 2006-06-07 14:27:50 |
| Message-ID: | 29728.1149690470@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com" <shakahshakah(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm trying to make sense of Section 22.1.3 ("Preventing transaction ID
> wraparound failures") in the on-line docs to make sure the DB's
> autovacuum settings are adequate and are having an effect.
> ...
> I don't see numbers larger than 1 billion in my pg_database columns,
> though.
The pg_database columns only update when you do a database-wide VACUUM,
which is something that autovacuum only undertakes when it sees that
the age values are getting large. I forget the exact threshold, but
at ~28M transactions you are certainly a long way away.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-07 14:31:22 | Re: Problem with 'postgres' db with 8.0 on a MacBook |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-07 14:05:17 | Re: Can PostGreSQL slow down a Windows PC much? |