Re: serial column vs. explicit sequence question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Charlie Toohey <ctoohey(at)pacbell(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: serial column vs. explicit sequence question
Date: 2002-06-13 21:13:16
Message-ID: 29716.1024002796@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Charlie Toohey <ctoohey(at)pacbell(dot)net> writes:
> A better solution would seem to use a sequence explicitly, rather than a id
> column of type serial. I would obtain the id value from the sequence, and
> then insert this id into the master table and into the detail table.

Yup. But there's no need to change how you create the id column; serial
is just fine, since all it is is a sequence and a DEFAULT nextval('foo').
You just do something like

select nextval('name-of-id-columns-sequence') into $masterid;
insert into master(id, ...) values ($masterid, ...);
insert into detail ... $masterid ...;

rather than letting the default expression do it for you.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-06-13 21:30:37 Re: Another postgres 'file not found' error
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-06-13 21:06:06 Re: serial column vs. explicit sequence question