| From: | "Tony Lausin" <tonylausin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
| Date: | 2006-04-30 11:01:36 |
| Message-ID: | 296cdcaf0604300401x7dfee354lfe0395aa1c04c886@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello all,
I'm working on a CMS which requires an open source database capable of
handling hundreds of thousands of users simultaneously, with a high
rate of database writes, and without buckling. We're talking somewhere
between nerve.com/catch27.com and xanga.com/friendster.com
PostgreSQL is a personal favorite of mine, and my gut instinct is that
it's the best choice for a large scale CMS serving many users;
however, I'm getting antsy. I keep getting suggestions that Postgres
is really only suited to small and medium projects, and that I should
be looking at MySQL for a large scale database drive site. I'm not
really a fan of MySQL, but I'll consider it if it truly is the better
choice in this case. I just don't understand how it would be. I'm
thinking this is solely in reference to VACUUM. Even with autovacuum
suport, I tend to agree there is at least one handicap.
I could really use some enlightenment on just where PostgreSQL fits in
a single-server, highly-trafficked web site serving mostly text,
pictures and possibly streaming media.
Regards,
Anthony
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Goodenough | 2006-04-30 11:23:37 | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-30 10:33:04 | Re: how can i view deleted records? |