Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 02:14:53
Message-ID: 29699.951358493@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> But I can feel the punches of Marc already - this patch will
> cause catalog changes after official BETA start - Uh - Oh.

You can hide behind me ;-) ... I just did commit some catalog changes
(but didn't need to force initdb, since they were only additions).

Also, I am more than half expecting that I will have to force an initdb
to clean up the INET/CIDR comparison business; very likely we are
going to end up needing to have separate comparison operators for
INET and CIDR.

Still waiting for input on that from the folks who use the datatypes,
though. (D'Arcy, are you still out there?)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff MacDonald 2000-02-24 02:21:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Interested in writing a PostgreSQL article?
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-02-24 01:33:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization