From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | yazicivo(at)ttnet(dot)net(dot)tr, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: running script on server shutdown (TODO) |
Date: | 2005-12-11 00:11:48 |
Message-ID: | 29696.1134259908@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> This is what bothers me about having such an informal TODO list. There is a
> danger that people will work in items only to have them shot down, which is
> a great way to turn off developers. And there is also a danger that other
> people will think that the todo item is likely to be accepted at some stage.
I've complained to Bruce about that before --- there are a number of items
on TODO that only one person thinks is a good idea.
Perhaps some sort of [controversial] marker would be useful to warn
people that the item needs more discussion before going off in a corner
and trying to implement it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-11 00:22:42 | Re: running script on server shutdown (TODO) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-10 22:47:44 | Re: running script on server shutdown (TODO) |