From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation |
Date: | 2018-04-17 18:09:53 |
Message-ID: | 29693.1523988593@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> When VACUUM tries to truncate the trailing empty pages, it scans shared_buffers
> to invalidate the pages-to-truncate during holding an AccessExclusive lock on
> the relation. So if shared_buffers is huge, other transactions need to wait for
> a very long time before accessing to the relation. Which would cause the
> response-time spikes, for example, I observed such spikes several times on
> the server with shared_buffers = 300GB while running the benchmark.
> Therefore, I'm thinking to propose $SUBJECT and enable it to avoid such spikes
> for that relation.
I think that the real problem here is having to do a scan of all of shared
buffers. VACUUM's not the only thing that has to do that, there's also
e.g. DROP and TRUNCATE. So rather than a klugy solution that only fixes
VACUUM (and not very well, requiring user intervention and an unpleasant
tradeoff), we ought to look at ways to avoid needing a whole-pool scan to
find the pages belonging to one relation. In the past we've been able to
skate by without a decent solution for that because shared buffers were
customarily not all that big. But if we're going to start considering
huge buffer pools to be a case we want to have good performance for,
that's got to change.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-04-17 18:13:30 | Re: Deadlock in multiple CIC. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-17 18:01:23 | Re: remove quoting hacks and simplify bootscanner.l |