| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-09-27 23:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | 29693.1127863151@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> fix ALTER SCHEMA RENAME for sequence dependency, or remove feature
I've posted a proposed patch to fix this. The patch requires an initdb
(to add new sequence functions), so if we do that we may as well also
fix the 32/64bit risk mentioned here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg01241.php
Also, the floor seems open to discuss whether or not to revert the file
access functions to their pre-beta2 APIs. I've got mixed feelings about
that myself, but you can certainly make a case that the current
definitions are not enough cleaner than what was there before to justify
changing. This seems particularly true for pg_cancel_backend(), which
already was in the core in 8.0.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-27 23:44:20 | Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-27 23:12:21 | Re: Vacuum questions... |