Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Date: 2006-06-12 02:54:51
Message-ID: 29689.1150080891@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Trying to get back on point. What is the scope of work for the TODO
> item? Forget everything else I brought up. What is the goal of the
> existing TODO?

I'm not sure that the TODO item has a reason to live at all, but surely
the first item of work for it should be to figure out what its use-case
is. If pg_dump isn't going to use these functions, what will?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-06-12 03:25:03 Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-06-12 02:43:00 Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),