Re: Postgres batch write very slow - what to do

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: femski <hypertree(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres batch write very slow - what to do
Date: 2007-03-16 02:15:39
Message-ID: 29684.1174011339@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

femski <hypertree(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> If 17k record/sec is right around expected then I must say I am little
> disappointed from the "most advanced open source database".

Well, the software is certainly capable of much more than that;
for instance, on a not-too-new Dell x86_64 machine:

regression=# \timing
Timing is on.
regression=# create table t1(f1 int);
CREATE TABLE
Time: 3.614 ms
regression=# insert into t1 select * from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
Time: 3433.483 ms

which works out to something a little shy of 300K rows/sec. Of course
the main difference from what I think you're trying to do is the lack of
any per-row round trips to the client code. But you need to look into
where the bottleneck is, not just assume it's insoluble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Romanchuk 2007-03-16 05:41:50 Re: Determine dead tuples size
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2007-03-15 15:58:25 Re: Dispatch-Merge pattern