| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items |
| Date: | 2015-12-04 15:29:08 |
| Message-ID: | 29662.1449242948@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 1 December 2015 at 17:05, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> do we want to
>> back-patch those changes to 9.5 at this late date?
> Surely the whole point of a release process is to fix issues in the
> release. If we don't ever dare put something in the release, we may as well
> have released it earlier.
> I'm thinking about a two stage release process...
> Stage 1 - released, but with caveats and some parts marked
> experimental/beta whatever
> Stage 2 - released, all caveats resolved
> Not sure what to call that.
9.5beta3. If you're saying we are not ready for an RC, then it's a beta.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-12-04 15:50:52 | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-04 15:26:20 | Re: Confusing results with lateral references |