"=?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?=" <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm not sure why the rowcount estimate is so far off, but the antijoin
>> code is all new and probably there's an estimation bug in there
>> somewhere. (You didn't get this plan, or anything at all like it,
>> from 8.1 ;-))
>>
> nope, that's up2date cvs head. I always test stuff on cvs head first,
I just committed a patch that might help a bit with that.
regards, tom lane