| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autotools update |
| Date: | 2005-07-02 23:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | 29632.1120345811@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> If it did produce different output, why haven't we noticed it prior to
>> this? Has there actually *been* a problem that nobody has reported?
>>
> Is autoconf actually run as part of any of our packaging scripts?
I don't think so ... but if Marc is the one to stamp a release number
into configure.in, his resulting configure might vary from other
people's versions, if the local autoconf on that machine is not
standard.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-07-02 23:24:05 | Re: Dbsize backend integration |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-02 23:05:27 | Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review requested |