| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing for usable C compiler |
| Date: | 2003-09-03 17:58:06 |
| Message-ID: | 29627.1062611886@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> BTW, would it be possible to tweak configure's test for "minimum working
>> C compiler" to include a check that cc accepts ANSI-style function
>> prototypes? That would allow us to bounce HP's lame excuse for a free
>> compiler with a slightly useful message ...
> Yes, unfortunately that involves that configure automatically mucks with
> CFLAGS, which could have interesting side-effects on some platforms.
Yeah. I would suggest doing it at the "check that C compiler still
works" stage, after we think we have all the CFLAGS. Couldn't we just
throw a prototyped function into that test program?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-03 17:58:53 | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
| Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2003-09-03 17:54:01 | Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? |