Re: 7.4?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Joe Tomcat <tomcat(at)mobile(dot)mp>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Darren Johnson <darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com>, reynaud(at)elma(dot)fr, pgreplication-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4?
Date: 2003-02-26 15:24:39
Message-ID: 29616.1046273079@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

=?iso-8859-15?q?Herv=E9=20Piedvache?= <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> writes:
> Le Mercredi 26 Fvrier 2003 07:52, Tom Lane a crit :
>> But none of the available GC systems are BSD-license open source. We
>> had had some hopes of getting Spread to offer BSD terms, but that seems
>> to have fallen through. So right now, PG-R is on the outside looking
>> in, as far as inclusion in the core distribution goes :-(

> You mean the PG-R project will no be included in the PostgreSQL project
> unless someone rewrite the Spread GCS concept or similar system in a BSD
> licence ?

Well, we certainly won't be bundling Spread into the distribution if
it's not got a compatible license. I had originally hoped that the
PG-R project would end by having a complete sync replication solution
included in the standard PG distribution, but that goal is looking out
of reach at the moment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: 7.4? at 2003-02-26 10:55:51 from Hervé Piedvache

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-26 15:41:43 Re: how to recover after harddisk error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-26 15:17:07 Re: Join query crashes 7.3.1 backend...